|
Liz Savage
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Taking calcium and vitamin D supplements does not reduce breast
cancer incidence in postmenopausal women, according to data from a
randomized, doubled-blind, placebo-controlled trial published online
November 11 in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
Several observational and preclinical studies have suggested that
vitamin D supplements may reduce breast cancer risk, but results have
been inconsistent.
To test this possibility, researchers evaluated breast cancer
incidence as a secondary endpoint in the Women's Health Initiative
study in 36,282 postmenopausal women who were randomly assigned to take
1,000 mg of calcium plus 400 IU of vitamin D daily or to daily placebo.
(The primary endpoint of the study was effect of the supplements on hip
fracture.) Baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were determined in all
1,067 breast cancer cases and 1,067 matched control subjects.
In the current analysis, Rowan Chlebowski, M.D., Ph.D., of the Los
Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-University of
California Los Angeles Medical Center and colleagues found that the
incidence of invasive breast cancer was similar in the supplement and
placebo groups, with 528 and 546 cases, respectively. Additionally,
25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were only modestly associated with dietary
and supplement vitamin D intake and were not associated with breast
cancer risk in a nested case-control analysis.
These findings call into question recommendations for evaluation of
higher vitamin D dosage in future studies, according to the authors.
Furthermore, as 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were strongly associated
with leanness and high physical activity, which both influence breast
cancer risk, prior observational studies relating vitamin D levels to
breast cancer risk may have been influenced by these factors. "The main
findings do not support a causal relationship between calcium and
vitamin D supplement use and reduced breast cancer incidence" the
authors conclude.
In an accompanying editorial, Corey Speers and Powel Brown, M.D.,
Ph.D., of Baylor College of Medicine in Houston applaud the authors'
efforts to test the question in such a rigorous manner. Although the
editorialists agree that these data do not support an association
between calcium and vitamin D supplementation and breast cancer
incidence, they argue that further investigation is still needed to
adequately answer the question, including looking for genetic
influences on vitamin D serum levels, testing supplements in
premenopausal women, and following study participants for a longer
follow-up period.
"Because preclinical, epidemiological, and clinical trial results of
vitamin D supplementation are conflicting, additional studies will be
needed to determine whether vitamin D plus calcium will pre¬vent breast
cancer. However, this article by Chlebowski [and colleagues] offers an
important first step in addressing this issue," the editorialists
write. "The potential health benefits of vitamin D and calcium may yet
still have a bright future."
Source: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Original article:
Rowan T. Chlebowski, Karen C. Johnson, Charles Kooperberg et al. Calcium Plus Vitamin D Supplementation and the Risk of Breast Cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Nov 11, 2008.
|